Get News Updates RSS RSS Feed
Get News Updates
Real Estate
Automotive
Employment
Services
Classifieds
Market Place
Media Kit
Forms
News
HOME
Front Page
GMN Photo Galleries
Bulletin Board
Letters
Editorials
Schools
Sports
Business
Online Obituary Submission
Featured Special Sections
Ocean County
Health & FItness Guide
About Us
Archive
Contact Us
Services
Advertiser Index
Copyright©
2000 - 2009
GMN
All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use
Letters May 25, 2006
Search Archives


Writer wants referendum on future of nuclear plant

On March 1, at the public portion of the meeting, I requested the Ocean County Board of Chosen Freeholders to place the following question on the county ballot: "Shall the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant be closed upon the expiration of its current operating license?"

I anticipated their answer would be no, because our politically controlled courts gave elected officials a false excuse not to put such a question on the ballot for the people to express their will to elected officials.

As expected, the freeholders said no, using the court decision as their justification.

However, at the freeholders meeting of May 3, the Ocean County League of Women Voters requested the freeholders to call for the closing of the nuclear plant. The league's request allowed for the possibility of an end run around the court's phony decision on referendum.

And so, at the freeholders meeting of May 17, I requested the league reps sitting in the audience and the freeholders to do something out of the box. Let all the registered voters of Ocean County who would vote no to keeping the plant going mail postcards with their "no" to the league, the freeholders, their local governing body [and local newspapers]. Compare the counts for an overall count and there you have your referendum.

The freeholders responded with predicted silence. I am now waiting for the league's public response.

Ray Kalainikas

Manalapan